Interaction of Student Motivation with Contextual Approach and 5e Learning Cycle in Physics
pp. 16-22 | Published Online: December 2015 | DOI: 10.12973/unibulletin.412.2
In this study, it is aimed to investigate in what way students’ motivation in physics prior to the treatments of experimental study influences the effects on contextual approach and 5E learning cycle on their achievement. The data comes from a factorial-design-research from which the effects of context-based approach and 5E learning cycle on 11th grade students’ achievement in simple electric circuits in a physics class are explored. The Jouhnson-Neyman technique was used for testing the hypothesis of the study. The results are quite interesting. Students with high motivation in physics (above 2.81 out of 5.00) were observed to benefit more from the non-contextual physics instruction, while the students with low motivation in physics (below 1.85 out of 5.00) were observed to benefit more from the contextual physics instruction. Between these boundary values, effects of contextual and non-contextual physics instruction seem not to be different. For the interaction of motivation with 5E learning cycle, no significant interaction could be detected. That is to say, all the students with different levels of motivation in physics benefitted similarly from the 5E learning cycle.
Keywords: motivation, contextual approach, student achievement, learning cycle, physicsReferences
Abak, A. (2003). Modeling The Relationship Between University Students’ Selected Affective Characteristics and Their Physics Achievement (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Baser, H. B., & Kilinc, E. (2015). Investigating Pre-service Social Studies Teachers’ Global Social Responsibility Level. Educational Process: International Journal, 4(1-2), 45-55.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347-521.
Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications (Full report). Colorado Springs: BSCS.
Cahen, L. S., & Linn, R. L. (1971). Regions of significant criterion differences in aptitude-treatment-interaction research. American Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 521-530.
Flick, L. B. (1995). Complex instruction in complex classrooms: A synthesis of research on inquiry teaching methods and explicit teaching strategies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for research in science teaching, San Francisco, CA.
Fraas, J. W., & Newman, I. (1997). The use of the Johnson-Neyman confidence bands and multiple regression models to investigate interaction effects: Important tools for educational researchers and program evaluators. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 24(1), 14-24.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Kartal, S. E., Kocabas, I. (2014). An Alternative Educational System Based on the Opinions of Educational Stakeholders: Home Schools. Üniversitepark Bülten, 3(1-2), 56-69.
Millar, R. (1993). Physics in salters’ science. Physics Education, 28(6), 356.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Pesman, H., & Ozdemir, O. F. (2012). Approach-method interaction: The role of teaching method on the effect of context-based approach in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2127-2145.
Sekerci, A. R., & Canpolat, N. (2014). Impact ofArgumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory on Conceptual Comprehension of Turkish Students. Educational Process: International Journal, 3(1-2), 19-34.
Sekerci, A. R., & Canpolat, N. (2014). Effect of Argumentation on Prospective Science Teachers' Scientific Process Skills and Their Understanding of Nature of Scientific Knowledge in Chemistry Laboratory. Üniversitepark Bülten, 3(1-2), 7-18.
Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 155-167.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Call for Papers
UNIBULLETIN is calling for submissions to the Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2019.
Authors are invited to submit papers from the broader fields of the social sciences and related disciplines in the international context.
All submissions should be presented only in English. Manuscripts should be send to the Editor-in-Chief via e-mail: email@example.com
Submission Deadline: March 31, 2019.