Volume 9 Issue 1 (2020)

Identification of Student Thinking Error Patterns in Construction of Mathematical Proof

pp. 7-14  |  Published Online: September 2020  |  DOI: 10.22521/unibulletin.2020.91.1

Anton Prayitno and Febi Dwi Widayanti

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify patterns of student thinking errors in constructing mathematics proof. Therefore, the study employed a mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative paradigms. The subjects of this study were second-generation mathematics education students at Wisnuwardhana University and Kanjuruhan University, Indonesia. The results obtained showed that the pattern of students’ thinking errors in the construction of mathematical proof was due to insufficient initial knowledge about the definition of proof, and difficulties in connecting the concepts of rational numbers when operating two rational numbers.

Keywords: Student thinking error, error pattern, mathematical proof

References

Alcock, L. (2010). Interactions Between Teaching and Research: Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Real Analysis. In R. Leikin & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning Through Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education (Vol 5., pp. 227-245). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer.

Batanero, C., Godino, J. D., & Roa, R. (2004). Training Teachers to Teach Probability. Journal of Statistics Education, 12(1).

Blanton, M. L., & Stylianou, D. A. (2003). The Nature of scaffolding in Undergraduate Transition to Formal Proof. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 113-120). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai.

Cheng, Y.-H., & Lin, F.-L. (2009). Developing Learning Strategies for Enhancing Below Average Students’ Ability in Constructing Multi-Step Geometry Proof. In F.-L. Lin, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. deVilliers (Eds.), Proceeding of The ICMI Study 19 Conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education, Volume 1 (pp. 124-129). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.

Cirillo, M. (2009). Challenges to Teaching Authentic Mathematical Proof in School Mathematics. In F.-L. Lin (Ed.), Proceeding of The ICMI Study 19 Conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education, Volume 1 (pp. 130-135). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: Sage.

Dickerson, D. S. (2008). High School Mathematics Teachers’ Understandings of the Purposes of Mathematical Proof (Doctoral dissertation). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.

Köğce, D., Aydın, M., & Yıldız, C. (2010). The views of high school students about proof and their levels of proof (The case of Trabzon). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2544-2549.

Prayitno, A. (2016). The Characteristics of Students’ Refractive Thinking about Data. In M. S. Warsono (Ed.), Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science (ICRIEMS) (pp. 29-38). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Prayitno, A., Rossa, A., Widayanti, F. D., Rahayuningsih, S., Hamid, A., & Baidawi, M. (2018). Characteristics of Students’ Proportional Reasoning in Solving Missing Value Problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012021

Prayitno, A., Setyowati, V. L., Damayanti, N. W., Khasanah, F., Mayangsari, S. N., Mahardika, L. T.,…Pertiwi, R. I. (2018). Performance of Understanding Students’ Construction in the Naming Fraction of the Three Representation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1).

Samkof, A., Lai, Y., & Weber, K. (2012). On The Different Ways That Mathematicians Use Diagrams In Proof Construction. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 49-67.

Tall, D. (2008a). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 5-24.

Tall, D. (2008b, May). The Historical & Individual Development of Mathematical Thinking: Ideas that are Set-Before and Met-Before. Paper presented at Colóquio de Histório e Tecnologia no Ensino Da Mathemática, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2004). Semantic and Syntactic Proof Productions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(3), 209-234.

Announcement

Call for Papers

UNIBULLETIN is calling for submissions to the Vol. 9, Issue 2, 2020.

Authors are invited to submit papers from the broader fields of the social sciences and related disciplines in the international context. 

All submissions should be presented only in English. Manuscripts should be send to the Editor-in-Chief via e-mail: editor@unibulletin.com