Intercultural Communication in the Multicultural World
pp. 28-36 | Published Online: September 2020 | DOI: 10.22521/unibulletin.2020.91.3
Anzhelina A. Koriakina
Today’s intercultural communication forms the basis for designing the multicultural world, and represents an important and interesting area of research. This article focusses on the problems of modern intercultural communication and aims to determine and justify the role of intercultural communication in the construction of the multicultural world. This is achieved through the identification of the characteristics of intercultural communication, leading to the establishment of mutual understanding and the formation of solidarity. The theoretical significance of this article lies in its qualitative research based on the analysis of the literature on intercultural communication, clarification of the key concepts, and the formulation of conclusions. The article is devoted to the study of intercultural communication from the perspective of Lasswell’s (1948) model, which distinguished the communicative act as based on five components: communicator, recipient, message, channel, and effect. The nature of intercultural communication is revealed through the analysis of these five components. The message, as a component of the communicative act, is understood as a message transmitted in a specific language. Communicator and recipient are considered as representatives of different cultures who may have diametrically opposing characteristics. The perspective channel of effective intercultural communication is seen as the increasing use of modern information technologies, whilst the effect is in constructive communication forming the basis of cultural integration.
Keywords: Intercultural communication, communication, culture, communicative act, national culturesReferences
Berger, P., Lukman, T. (1995). Social construction of reality. Moscow, Russia: Medium.
Castells, M. (2010). Communication, Power and Counter-Power in a Networked Society. Sociological Yearbook. Moscow, Russia: RAS.
Duke, D. (2014). The Jewish question through the eyes of an American. http://read24.ru/fb2/devid-dyuk-evreyskiy-vopros-glazami-amerikantsa/
Fernham, A., Bochner, S. (1986). Cultural shock. London, United Kingdom: Oxford University.
Garfinkel, G. (1999). The concept of “trust”: Trust as a condition for stable concerted actions and its experimental study. Social and Human Sciences, Sociology, 11(4), .
Hall, E. (2002). How to understand a foreigner without words. Moscow, Russia: Veche.
Hofstede, G. (2008). Organizational Culture. Moscow, Russia: RAS.
Husserl, E. (1999). Ideas for Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. Moscow, Russia: DIK.
Kochetkov, V. (2002). Psychology of intercultural differences. Moscow, Russia: Per Se.
Krasheninnikova, V. Y. (2007). Russia and America. Cold war of cultures. Moscow, Russia: Europe.
Lasswell, G. (1948). Power and Personality. Westport, CN: Greenwood.
Lebon, G. (2011). Psychology of Peoples and Masses. Moscow, Russia: Academic Project.
Levada, Y. (2002). From opinions to understanding. Sociological essays 1993-2000. Moscow, Russia: MSPI..
Lewis, R. (2001). Business cultures in international business. Moscow, Russia: Business.
McLuhan, M. (2005). The Gutenberg Galaxy. Moscow, Russia: Academic project.
Mead, D. G. (1997). Mind, Society and I. Social and Human Sciences, Sociology, 11(4).
Myasoedov, S. (2003). Fundamentals of cross-cultural management. Moscow, Russia: Academic project.
Persikova, Т. N. (2008). Intercultural communication and corporate culture. Moscow, Russia: Logos.
Schutz, A. (2003). The semantic structure of the everyday world: essays on phenomenological sociology. Moscow, Russia: Institute of Fund Public Opinion.
Scolari, K. A. (2010). Mapping of discussions about new media: Theoretical field of digital communication. Sociological Yearbook. Moscow, Russia: RAS.
Sokolova, M. Y. (2010). Social scientific networks and the “open code” of the “generation of Google”. Sociological Yearbook. Moscow, Russia: RAS.
Sorokin, P. A. (2006). Social and cultural dynamics. Moscow, Russia: Astrel.
Ter-Minasova, S. G. (2000). Language and intercultural communication. Moscow, Russia: Slovo.
Vereshchagin, E. M., Kostomarov, V. G. (1990). Language and culture. Moscow, Russia: Russian language.
Wundt, V. (2010). Problems of the psychology of peoples. Moscow, Russia: Academic Project.
Call for Papers
UNIBULLETIN is calling for submissions to the Vol. 9, Issue 2, 2020.
Authors are invited to submit papers from the broader fields of the social sciences and related disciplines in the international context.
All submissions should be presented only in English. Manuscripts should be send to the Editor-in-Chief via e-mail: email@example.com